Summitbagger: La Plata Peak edition

Once again the wagon headed west, bound for frontiers unfathomable.

Actually, I have fathomed La Plata Peak, Colorado's fifth highest at 14,336 feet, many times this summer, plotting my triumphant straddling of the kitter litter streusel atop the Sawatch Range. This weekend the window opened up, framed by aspens crisping to tater tot gold beneath a lacquered blue sky.

An agreeable dusting of snow from earlier in the week informed out quest as far more rugged and extreme than was the reality. Much like blonde highlights, a few streaks of white laid into high ravines and crags will do an excellent job of highlighting the "dimensionality" (in Loreal parlance) of Colorado's majestic mounds. Our campsite, above, was at a secret locale known only to ourselves and four or five other RVs, four other dogs, and a broad selection of granola tent-dwellers - in other words, a few thousand people, tops. It looked over the Twin Lakes southwest of Leadville, and was nestled into the navel hair of Mt. Elbert's lowest approach.

The hike into La Plata Peak does a good job of building to a crescendo of thigh-crushing switchbacks over increasingly unstable rock. Above, we scaled a track that beat its way up to the northwest ridge of La Plata, glancing all the way at the impressive outline of Grizzly Peak (an almost fourteener at 13,988 ft). We passed no one until late in the hike, but could see hikers silhouetted high above the rising sun. Much like Shoeless Joe, they bid us into the upper realms where vegetation and sediment seem to explode open against themselves, looking either to take off or plummet to the bottom of La Plata's central gully.

We were accompanied by three load-free dogs, each of whom possessed an endless thirst that quickly dwindled our royal supplies of water. Note that they were all kept on leash, per forest requirements, and all eagerly yanked the leash forward, bringing their steward into awkward ankle-crunches over the mish-mash of steps, gravel, dirt and boulders.

The terrain got sketchy enough that after 2 1/2 hours of climbing, and enough progress over sketchy scree-fields while thinking "how will we get down?" with the dogs, we reached this friendly balcony and paused for a photo-op. Bringing the dogs up the last few hundred feet of gain was unquestionably a recipe for disaster (Gaston later admitted he had walked through the mental possibility of having to bury one of his dogs on the mountain after a calamitous misstep), so we debated leaving one person behind to mind the three dogs while the other two of us bagged our summit. Leaving one person on a boutique-sized plateau at 13,800 with three dogs for an hour seemed a poor decision, though the pull of summit-bagging was strong as ever. Rather than become "those dickheads" who were suckered into a summit campaign only to become shredded to pieces in an avalanche chute and mentioned briefly in the Denver Post the following Monday (Denver man falls off mountain), we made the prudent decision to invest instead in a couple of great iPhone pics. As the photo above proves, a non-summit bag will often make for a far more impressive souvenir pic than will actually standing on the summit. If you peruse the halls of internet summit-bag photo-ops, you will notice that they all look the same: two people, cold, against a blue screen, with some pebbles under foot. On the other hand, a gnarly summit will advocate the hiker in foreground with low growl of topographic contrast: "Ten contour intervals to go, biatches!"

Here, you will notice my dog taking the wussy dry-foot option for the river-crossing, faithfully following his master. Neither dog nor human is too disappointed at chalking up a summit attempt. Indeed, in the trailhead log, I note "Karen and Irene" of Denver whose destination was "until we get tired :-) " Likewise, my response to such a question is always "Up! Then down." To the mountains!